Employee Stress and Performance
Introduction
Employee stress and its
impact on performance is a prevalent issue in the workplace. Stress can be
defined as a state of physical or emotional tension resulting from demanding
circumstances or situations. While some stress can be beneficial in motivating
individuals to perform better, prolonged and excessive stress can have adverse
effects on employees' health and performance. High levels of stress can lead to
burnout, fatigue, and decreased engagement, which can result in reduced productivity,
increased absenteeism, and even employee. Stress can also affect employees'
cognitive abilities, including decision-making, problem-solving, and
creativity, which can impact their job performance and effectiveness. Therefore,
it is essential for organizations to address employee stress and develop
strategies to manage it effectively. This can include creating a supportive
work environment, promoting work-life balance, offering stress management
programs, and providing employees with the resources they need to manage stress
effectively. By reducing stress and promoting employee well-being,
organizations can improve their employees' job satisfaction, engagement, and
performance, leading to better business outcomes and a healthier, more
productive workforce.
There are several
theories that explain the relationship between employee stress and performance:
- v Demand-Control
Model: This model suggests that high job demands and low job control are
associated with increased job strain, which can result in poor health outcomes,
decreased job satisfaction, and reduced performance.
- v Job
Demands-Resources Model: This model proposes that job resources, such as
autonomy, social support, and feedback, can buffer the negative effects of job
demands on employee well-being and performance.
- v Cognitive
Appraisal Theory: This theory suggests that stress arises from an individual's
appraisal of a situation as threatening or demanding. The way an individual
appraises a situation influences their stress response, which can impact their
performance.
- v Conservation
of Resources Theory: This theory suggests that individuals strive to protect
and build their resources, including physical, psychological, and social resources.
When these resources are threatened or depleted, stress can occur, which can
negatively impact performance.
- v Job
Strain Theory: This theory suggests that high job demands, low job control, and
low social support are associated with increased job strain, which can result
in poor health outcomes, decreased job satisfaction, and reduced performance.
v Overall,
these theories suggest that employee stress can have a significant impact on
performance and well-being, and it is essential for organizations to develop
strategies to manage stress effectively to promote a healthy and productive
workforce (Park & Jex, 2019).
Conclusion
In conclusion, employee
stress and its impact on performance is a critical issue in the workplace.
While some stress can be beneficial in motivating individuals to perform
better, excessive and prolonged stress can have adverse effects on employees'
health and performance, leading to decreased engagement, productivity, and even
turnover. Organizations must address employee stress and develop effective
strategies to manage it, such as creating a supportive work environment,
promoting work-life balance, offering stress management programs, and providing
employees with the resources they need to manage stress effectively. By
promoting employee well-being, organizations can improve their employees' job
satisfaction, engagement, and performance, leading to better business outcomes
and a healthier, more productive workforce. It is crucial for organizations to
recognize the importance of addressing employee stress and to prioritize the
development and implementation of stress management strategies to promote
employee well-being and optimize business outcomes.
References
Cooper, C. L., &
Cartwright, S. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford Handbook of organizational
well-being. Oxford University Press.
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker,
A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Burnout and work engagement: Insights
from a person-oriented approach. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 70-71.
Karasek Jr, R. A. (1979).
Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job
redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 285-308.
Park, Y., & Jex, S.
M. (2019). Trajectories of employee emotional exhaustion: An examination of the
demand-control-support model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(2),
152-163.
Quick, J. C., &
Tetrick, L. E. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of occupational health psychology.
American Psychological Association.
Sauter, S. L., Hurrell
Jr, J. J., & Murphy, L. R. (Eds.). (2017). Job stress: Current theory and
research. Routledge.
This is really important. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteThank you
DeleteThank you very much. I'm very interested in this topic.
ReplyDeleteThank you
DeleteThis is really informative. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThank you
DeleteThis is very important for us.
ReplyDeleteAgain a very good point taken to manage employee stress in the workplace. Eys, P. (2021) Recognized that under-stressed workers are more prone to making mistakes, delivering poor performance, developing mental health issues, burning out, and getting into conflict at work. If job stress is not controlled, organizations pay the price with higher rates of turnover, disengagement, and absenteeism. On the other side, human resources can identify and support team members who are having difficulties when they are aware of how job stress affects employee performance. Here's a breakdown of how stress affects employees' performance and how HR can help the group.
ReplyDeleteEmployee stress can have a significant impact on job performance. When employees are stressed, their ability to focus, think critically, and make decisions can be impaired, leading to decreased productivity and performance. Here are some ways that employee stress can affect job performance
Delete